FAMILY LAW- Vulnerable Mafia?

Family Law: Vulnerable Mafia (gagged by the Brown Broadcasting C....)

'There is a hidden small civil war, happening now between defenceless parents, biased closed family law practices and local Social Services departments in various areas in the UK.

Some families are being deprived of justice and are pushed to the point of suicide and disability due to the enormous strain of having to fight for their lives in secret family courts, these crimes are being commited within the Public Family Law courts in the UK.

Most parents in this situ have no option but to fight the monumental might of a council, with their unlimited resources, the parents often without unbiased professional aid.

These parents are fighting not only for their children but for their reputation -so easily tarnished due false allegations and exaggeration of 'behavior' as a result of draconian actions by councils and family courts.

Malicious gossip and whispering campaigns in Local Authorities must be outlawed as 'Hate Crime' and perpetrator brought to justice.

These rotten campaigns spread into every area of a persons' life.

False allegations and oppression against parents often leave the parents incapable of caring for their family without help, due to widespread failing health from the stress of the fight- like a self-fulfilling prophecy - manipulated by councils.

A simple dislike of a particular parent/s can trigger a domino-effect of emotional torture and charachter assassination against innocent people by professionals employed in the name of 'care' when it is rather 'Authoritian Dictatorship'- destruction of a good family by councils because they CAN do it and do, all too easily.

Presumably the councils intention to effectively destroy a families' life forever for fun (I have seen Social Workers say 'let's stop [] seeing the kid!!' ) whilst actually simply securing the need for their own welfare whilst filling budgets to justify their employment.

A social worker or other council professional (whom has the opulence of unlimited legal support) creates and manipulates a domino-effect of emotional torture so as to effectively destroy a families' life forever.

All in a days work.

Social Services are responsible for childrens' welfare- to drag them screaming from loving parents' or leaving them exposed to other dangers cannot ever be justified outside of the secret family courts, wars have been started for less. '

F4J and the public courts are two different matters. Public courts are the ones where social services dominate the proceedings and dictate to the judges, charmingly spout lies to gain their incentives (need to fill adoption/fostering/special needs []slots) they have teams of legal and medical professionals all backing each other so a hapless innocent parent (target) is left with no recourse at all against the monolithic wall of power that has no governing body. Childrens’ Social Services have no governing body as of April 2007, Judges have no governing body and someone call Trading Standards as they are not working on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen.

In fact it appears we have Family Lawer Mafia running the PUBLIC family law courts (social service domination) . The PRIVATE (divorce) family law courts are open, but CAFCASS are involved in both types of courts. It’s important to distinguish between these two types of court as mothers are generally the targets in public - Elizabeth Robillard

------------------------------------------------------------

social workers the ultimate narcissists, please see my website;

The fact that social workers and employees involved with any local authority, such as those permanent employees at Adoption and Permanancy panels globally are given training in matters pertaining to family law prior to any proceedings. That's illegal isn't it? Isn't that a bias before a case is begun and therefore a violation of a fair hearing [Article 6 ECHR]?

This Leaves a vulnerable, hapless parent [target] violated by professional bullies whom are legally-trained (and trained in the latest 'psych techniques' too! Aren't we modern? Please see article 'psychiatry is redundant' with refs) .

The fact that social workers regard themselves as superior is an outrage and purely political - they are great puppets for their managers. They cannot move beyond BASIC psychology OR politics.


Not to mention the childrens' wishes completely unheard.

Nobody has mentioned the children who die on the streets fleeing care-homes- have they? Who cares about them? Shelter probably.

They (targets) do not stand a chance, especially once the parent has employed a family solicitor, all parties (except the parent-client-target) then these professionals collaborate regarding timing, payment, likely outcome of case and SO much more - all without the 'client' [ target parent] knowing about it. These professionals have access to all records, letters and every type of detail of your life.

Privacy of family courts? There's no privacy, there is for the courts.

They snort at the profits, in a joyful way.

This legal training for social workers ( Cafcass, etc) makes it a plain case of violation of Article 6 of the Human Rights' Act before any case has even reached court. Doesn't it?

Thank you for reading.

Elizabeth Robillard

I can be reached at www.elizabethrobillard.co.uk

(bbc, please, if you're going to censor me again, please just delete the bits that you find illegal?! I can't find any but then again, I'm nobody)


UPDATE, Just released by the government, the following responsible for childrens' social services and other childrens services as of now
CHILD HEALTH AND WELLBEING BOARD MEMBERSHIP
(As at December 2007)


Tom Jeffery (co-Chair)
Director-General for Children and Families, (DCSF)
Tom.JEFFERY@dcsf.gsi.gov.uk

Christine Beasley (co-Chair)
Director General for Children, Families and Maternity & Chief Nursing Officer (DH)
Christine.Beasley@dh.gsi.gov.uk

Dr. Sheila Shribman
National Clinical Director for Children, Young People and Maternity (DH)
Sheila.Shribman@dh.gsi.gov.uk

Anne Jackson
Director of Child Wellbeing Group (DCSF)
Anne.JACKSON@dcsf.gsi.gov.uk

Dr Valerie (Val) Day
Director, Public Health (DH)
Valerie.Day@dh.gsi.gov.uk

Hilary Samson-Barry
Director, Partnerships for Children, Families and Maternity (DH)
Hilary.Samson-Barry@dh.gsi.gov.uk

Dr. Will Cavendish
Director of Strategy
Will.Cavendish@dh.gsi.gov.uk

Dean Repper
Care Services Improvement Partnership, North West Development Centre
Dean.Repper@csip.org.uk

Sheila Scales
Director of Early Years, Extended Schools and Special Needs Group (DCSF)
Sheila.SCALES@dcsf.gsi.gov.uk

Helen Williams
Director, School Standards Group (DCSF)
Helen.WILLIAMS@dcsf.gsi.gov.uk

Paul Heron
Head of Sport (DCSM)
Paul.Heron@Culture.gsi.gov.uk

Peter Wanless
Director, Families Group (DCSF)
Peter.WANLESS@dcsf.gsi.gov.uk

Flora Goldhill
Director of Workforce Capacity, DH
flora.goldhill@dh.gsi.gov.uk

Mark Britnell
Director General of Commissioning and System Management, DH
mark.britnell@dh.gsi.gov.uk

Andrew Campbell
Director of Local Strategic Partnerships and Performance (CLG)
Andrew.Campbell@communities.gsi.gov.uk

Una O’Brien
Director General of Policy and Strategy (DH)
una.o’brien@dh.gsi.gov.uk

Tony Foot
Senior Policy Advisor for Schools (HM Treasury)
Tony.Foot@hm-treasury.x.gsi.gov.uk

Katherine Cowell
Prime Ministers Delivery Unit
Katherine.Cowell@hm-treasury.x.gsi.gov.uk

Sue Sylvester (Strategic Health Authority)
sue.sylvester@southcentral.nhs.uk

Jackie Doughty
Director for Children and Learners (Government Office North East)
Jackie.doughty@gone.gsi.gov.uk

(Professor) Paul Johnstone
Regional Director, Public Health (DH)
Paul.johnstone@dh.gsi.gov.uk

Ann Baxter
Director of Children’s Services, Stockton-on-Tees
ann.baxter@stockton.gov.uk
Rachel Tyndall (PCT Chief executive)
rachel.tyndall@islingtonpct.nhs.uk

Leigh Sandals
Deputy Director, Corporate Performance (DCSF)
Leigh.sandals@dcsf.gsi.gov.uk



BBC PLEASE STOP GAGGING FREEDOM OF SPEECH THIS ARTICLE IS COPYRIGHT TOO

hm Queen Elizabeth - letter ma'am

HRH Queen Elizabeth
via email

26th November 2007 (copied to BBC)

Dear Madam,


Please pardon my temerity at writing and for this intrusion.

I'm writing as your servant and distant- relative (De Lucy, Robillard, Champagne) and as the daughter of J.G.L Robillard whom was decorated (by your father) for his efforts as a pilot with the CRAF and RAF during WW11.

Please review family court lawyers and judges acting 'in your name' - they are accountable to nobody (no governing body) and acting, in some instances, as power-crazed (sorry for the strong language) but they ought be judging their findings on evidence when at the moment they depend heavily on the words of social workers (childrens services as of April 2007 also have no governing body) whilst all parties whom truly benefit (bar parents involved) are legal departments, all of whom make huge profit often with the hapless parent unaware of why children are taken from them etc .

In an effort to understand this, I took six months of university reading social sciences and dropped out due to is heavy bias toward communism and my refusing to put my name to work I was ordered to plageurise (communist bias)

Also the training of social workers is often popular psychology (most is hypothesis very far from any fact) yet learned men and women willingly accept the view of these people, employed in your name, over that of your citizens and friends that actually know the families involved, wishing for fairness and openess in your public family courts, for their friends (eg friends - up to 20 in some cases, go to court as witnesses for the parent, but the power of authority to rule, outweighs that of any justice)

It would be refreshing to see such judges not depending on their perception of psychology eg a scoundrel knows to 'show remorse' (crocodile tears) will often release him from charges. This is common knowledge and I believe the judiciary are aware of this only recently.

Sadly I have personal tragic experience of these public family courts and despite informing my MP (Sir Rifkind) very little appears to be done to stop the local authorities simply being able to march into anyones home and 'kidnap' children for the sake of filling the needs of job placements, such as permanent adoption and fostering officers and departments.

As a disabled mother and previously an actress, I am sad to find myself an unfortunate campaigner for public family law reform.

This job, separating families, surely ought to be one of a community, including free legal support for a parent in such a plight, as well as impartial support for the child? Too much communist influence is determining the lives of the British people as far as I can see.

The Children Act ultimately says 'the paramount interest of the child' but surely the abuse of that statement- leaving judges to disregard fact eg hundreds of hard fact evidence due to a social worker or two urging it, is contrary to the paramount interest of the child?

Thank you for your kind observation and consideration

As always

your servant

Elizabeth Robillard